John Clark; with Matthew Roper and Wade Ardern (co-authors), The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR), 2005.
Virtually all LDS critics have claimed that, not only doesnn++t archaeology support the Book of Mormon, but that it confounds the Nephite scripture. Dr. John Clark, director of the New World Archaeological Foundation, examines this claim. Clark shows that while archaeological evidence weighed against the Book of Mormon in 1830, recent archaeological studies have now tipped the scales in favor of the Book of Mormon. While most items mentioned in the Book of Mormon were unknown from the New World archaeological record for the nearly a century after the book was translated, today the major of those items have received some archaeological verification.
No customer comments for the moment.
Only registered users can post a new comment.